| [Contents Page] |
3.7.1 Opportunities
3.7.2 Strengths
3.7.3 Risks
3.7.4 Weaknesses
A Riverside Centre would make a major contribution to the regeneration of Twickenham by increasing awareness of its riverside environment and heritage. It will do this by providing a point of focus for the cultural identity of Twickenham, which will attract tourists and visitors to the town centre.
An integrated Centre is more robust to the vicissitudes of fashion and finance than one that supports just a single function, but it is not without risk. The opportunities, strengths, weaknesses and risks of the Centre are:
Twickenham has grown from a riverside village, but the river remains at its core and one of the best parts of it is the site of this development. In the 18th Century, a tradition was founded of Twickenham as a centre of excellence in literature, painting, music and crafts that is maintained by the present artistic community. The views, the environmental features, and the combination of a working and a recreational river, continue to attract visitors and residents. The Centre will:
|
|
|
|
The Centre will relate strongly to the river and it will:
|
|
|
The Centre will become a focus for town life and tourism and as such will contribute significantly to the regeneration of Twickenham town centre. It will:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is normal for Discovery Centres to raise funds from the local community and funding bodies, for projects, exhibits and further development. Fundraising is always hard, but this area has the advantage of a population with a strong sense of civic responsibility and suitable skills and experience in funding local projects.
Local shops, businesses and groups have a good track record in sponsoring relatively modest identifiable objects or projects.
Because of its composite nature and flexible building it will be possible to adapt or extend the Centre to future needs, trends or developments.
The Centre has a number of fundamental strengths.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are risks associated with the venture. However, they are risks that can be addressed, not grounds for rejecting the proposal.
|
|
In the light of the current perception of the Millennium Dome and other major Millennium projects, the Council may conclude that it is unwilling to support the Centre.
A review of such projects (‘The Times’, 4th February 2000) showed that the failures were mainly associated with acceptance of ambitious attendance figures prepared by consultants, and the aim of being a national attraction. Less ambitious projects that focus on local strengths and needs are proving successful.
The proposal made in this report is for a Centre with strong local focus. The recommendation contained in the Tym’s report for a national Riverside Discovery Centre has been firmly rejected.
It is essential that the Council is not exposed to claims for subsidy. The initial view is that the financial and management arrangements can be structured so as to ensure against that risk. However, this is an item that requires detailed attention, whilst the Developer is preparing his proposal, before a firm commitment is made.
One can foresee a number of problems arising in the future. Each is a consequence of bad management, and can be avoided by good management. They include:
|
|
|
|
|
There are a number of identifiable weaknesses:
|
|
|
|
|
| 1. | A Riverside Centre of at least 1,350m2 with Discovery, Arts, Heritage and commercial elements be approved in principle as part of the Twickenham riverside redevelopment. | ||||||||
| 2. |
The Centre Working Group moves on to the essential next steps as stated above:
|
| [Contents Page] |